- HOME
- Library
- Issues
- Regions
- Asia and the Pacific
- Afganistan
- Armenia
- Australia
- Azerbaijan
- Bangladesh
- Bhutan
- Brunei Darussalam
- Cambodia
- China
- Cyprus
- Democratic People's Republic of Korea
- Fiji
- Georgia
- India
- Indonesia
- Japan
- Kazakhstan
- Kiribati
- Kyrgyzstan
- Lao People's Democratic Republic
- Malaysia
- Maldives
- Marshall Islands
- Micronesia (Federated States of)
- Mongolia
- Myanmar
- Nauru
- Nepal
- New Zealand
- Pakistan
- Palau
- Papua New Guinea
- Philippines
- Republic of Korea
- Samoa
- Singapore
- Solomon Islands
- Tajikistan
- Thailand
- Timor Leste
- Tonga
- Turkey
- Turkmenistan
- Tuvalu
- Uzbekistan
- Vanuatu
- Viet Nam
- Europe
- Albania
- Andorra
- Austria
- Belarus
- Belgium
- Bosnia and Herzegovina
- Bulgaria
- Croatia
- Czech Republic
- Denmark
- Estonia
- Finland
- France
- Germany
- Greece
- Hungary
- Iceland
- Italy
- Latvia
- Liechtenstein
- Lithuania
- Luxembourg
- Malta
- Monaco
- Montenegro
- Netherlands
- Norway
- Poland
- Portugal
- Republic of Moldova
- Romania
- Russian Federation
- San Marino
- Serbia
- Slovakia
- Slovenia
- Spain
- Sweden
- Switzerland
- The former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia
- Ukraine
- United Kingdom
- North Africa/Middle East
- Sub-Saharan Africa
- Angola
- Benin
- Botswana
- Burkina Faso
- Burundi
- Cameroon
- Cape Verde
- Central African Republic
- Chad
- Comoros
- Congo (Republic of the)
- Democratic Republic of the Congo
- Djibouti
- Eritrea
- Ethiopia
- Gabon
- Gambia
- Ghana
- Guinea
- Guinea-Bissau
- Kenya
- Lesotho
- Liberia
- Madagascar
- Malawi
- Mali
- Mauritania
- Mauritius
- Mozambique
- Namibia
- Niger
- Nigeria
- Rwanda
- Sao Tome and Principe
- Senegal
- Seychelles
- Sierra Leone
- Somalia
- South Africa
- Sudan
- Swaziland
- Togo
- Uganda
- United Republic of Tanzania
- Zambia
- Zimbabwe
- The Americas
- Antigua and Barbuda
- Argentina
- Bahamas
- Barbados
- Belize
- Bolivia
- Brazil
- Canada
- Chile
- Colombia
- Costa Rica
- Cuba
- Dominica
- Dominican Republic
- Ecuador
- El Salvador
- Grenada
- Guatemala
- Guyana
- Haiti
- Honduras
- Jamaica
- Mexico
- Nicaragua
- Panama
- Paraguay
- Peru
- Saint Kitts and Nevis
- Saint Lucia
- Saint Vincent and the Grenadines
- Suriname
- Trinidad and Tobago
- United States
- Uruguay
- Venezuela
- Asia and the Pacific
- Resource Type
- Discuss
- Ask the Experts
- News
- About
- myknowpolitics
Balancing politics and family
What can be done to redress the “triple workload” of women in politics: family, career and political responsibilities? What strategies do women use to expand interpretations of “traditional or cultural” roles of women to allow for their political participation? How can men and women work together to make political parties and legislatures more family-friendly? What programs exist to help women balance their personal and public life?
Tags:






Comments
Life-Work Balance for Women in Politics
This topic is very important for women’s political participation. It is true that women often hesitate to run in politics due to the heavy workload at home and at work, and sometimes they event face a triple workload. Many women feel torn between their family responsibilities and political careers. In the Inter-Parliamentary Union’s Survey of Women and Men in Parliaments ( http://www.ipu.org/PDF/publications/equality08-e.pdf) , women mentioned “domestic responsibilities” as the number one factor that deters them from entering politics, while the same factor only ranked 11th among male respondents. A classic example is when women are forced to attend late night meetings in parliaments and political parties, which they often may not be able to do because they need to take care of their children and families at that time. It also may not be safe for them for them to travel at night to attend a meeting or a social gathering, which means that they need to find a male chaperon or an escort to be able to attend the meeting. In some cases, women also have to maintain work-load at their regular jobs on top of being involved in politics and having families. This is particularly relevant for women running and participating in local governments.
These and many other barriers require a consistent and step-by-step policy approach aimed at creating a favorable environment for women to participate in politics and public life. It is important that political parties and government institutions take a proactive approach in creating internal policies accounting for women’s needs. By establishing such procedures, these institutions can be champions in advancing women in politics and serve as catalysts or multipliers of good practice.
It is also key for women and women’s groups to lobby political institutions to adopt gender-sensitive and family-friendly internal rules and procedures. They can hold advocacy campaigns arguing that creating such policies would equally benefit both male and female politicians. For instance, if parliaments are banned from holding their meetings late at night, it means that both men and women members of parliament will get home earlier and will be able to spend adequate time with their families and friends.
It would be interesting to hear more ideas and strategies implemented around the world to promote women’s political participation.
Sincerely,
Bahar Salimova