Skip to main content

Advocacy & Lobbying

The Fiji Women’s Rights Movement and the Fiji Women’s Crisis Centre have called for reforms to increase women’s participation in politics.

They outlined systemic barriers that limit women’s involvement in the political process.

During its joint oral submissions to the Fiji Law Reform Commission, FWRM Board Chair Akanisi Nabalarua and FWCC Manager Legal Services Miliana Tarai outlined several key recommendations to address these challenges and create a more inclusive political environment.

The submission has garnered widespread support from civil society organizations (CSOs) and non-governmental organizations (NGOs), including Empower Pacific, Young Women’s Christian Association, femLINKPacific, Strumphet Alliance Network, Rainbow Pride Foundation, and the Social Empowerment Education Program (SEEP) with more endorsements expected in the coming days.

The main focus of the submission is the need for financial and logistical support to enable women candidates to fully participate in election campaigns.

Alongside this, FWRM and FWCC are advocating for stronger civic education programs that promote voter rights and women’s leadership, as well as addressing societal norms that hinder women’s political engagement.

Read here the full article published by FBC News on 11 April 2025.

Image by FBC

 

At least 30 women politicians associated with different political parties at the local government level from two districts—Ratnapura and Kegalle—came together to discuss the digital threats they experience in their daily political careers due to their gender. This gathering was held in Ratnapura from 4-6 March. It was a unanimous consensus that every woman who participated in this event agreed that all of them are concerned about cyber gender-based violence, and that digital threats are on the rise.

When discussing the various digital threats they experience in their political careers, gendered disinformation was identified as a major issue. False news and fabricated information, manipulated images, video and audio clips, and misleading narratives are often used to discredit women. These false allegations, which often centre on their personal lives, morality, or relationships, circulate widely and damage their public image. This has a larger societal and political impact on their careers.

In addition, women discussed various digital threats they faced. Doxxing and privacy violations further endanger women politicians, as their personal details—such as home addresses and phone numbers—are leaked online and shared in public networking groups and WhatsApp groups. In many cases, such as in Matara and Ratnapura, it was also noted that women politicians often shared some personal information on social media. When questioned, they would say there is nothing to hide, as everyone knows everything. Our telephone numbers, NIC numbers, home addresses, dates of birth, etc., are almost everywhere. These international NGOs have them; Grama Niladharis, development officers, agricultural officers, local NGOs, even shop owners, pharmacies, and private companies have them.

Read here the full article published by DailyFT on 10 April 2025.

Image by DailyFT

 

The International Federation of Journalists (IFJ) will organise a live discussion on the Media coverage of women in politics and its impact on democracy on 10 April from 5 to 6.30 pm at the Residence Palace, rue de la loi 155, Brussels. 

These discussions follow the closure of one of the IFJ's landmark project "Rewriting the story: Gender, Media and Politics"  which addressed barriers to the fair representation and portrayal of women and men in political life. Working with frontline journalists, news media managers, journalism universities and journalists’ unions and associations, the project provided extensive research, developed specialised training modules for journalists and media newsrooms, trained over 300 journalists across Europe and beyond and ran an innovative Peer-to Peer programme, working with newsroom managers, producers, journalists and journalists’ unions to produce and adopt protocols, guidelines, agreements and initiate a mindset shift towards gender equality in editorial decisions and newsroom organisation and working conditions.

The panel discussions on 10 April will bring together:

Lina Galvez, MEP, chair of the FEMM group in the European Parliament

Sabinet Panet, Editor-in-chief of axelle magazine, Belgium

Shada Islam, Founder of New Horizons Project, independent commentator and analyst on EU affairs

Discussions will be moderated by Pamela Morinière, Gender expert, Head of Communications at the IFJ.

To register, click here.

Event published by the International Federation of Journalist

 

In a world of rising inequalities and immense challenges, 25 years of the Women, Peace, and Security (WPS) agenda, established through United Nations Security Council Resolution 1325, along with the 30th anniversary of the Beijing Declaration and Platform for Action, adopted at the Fourth World Conference on Women in 1995 present a significant opportunity to reflect on the progress women have made in shaping our societies. They also remind us that gender equality requires systemic change, and institutions must lead the way to renew our commitment to investing in women and girls, driving efforts toward inclusive economic growth, protecting our planet, reducing dependency, and fostering peace and stability.

Over 600 million women and girls live in proximity to armed conflict, with conflict-related sexual violence increasing by 50 per cent in 2024 alone. Despite their vital knowledge and expertise, women are often excluded from decision-making in peace and security efforts; however, sustainable peace is only attainable when women have a voice and a seat at the table. 

Women at the Heart of Preventing Violent Extremism in the Gulf of Guinea
Peripheral areas and borderlands, often characterised by socio-economic marginalisation and limited welfare services, are increasingly susceptible to the spread of extremist ideologies and narratives. The Journey to Extremism: Pathways to Recruitment and Disengagement report highlights the evolving gender dimensions of violent extremism. 

Across Benin, Burkina Faso, Côte d’Ivoire, Ghana, and Togo, women are demonstrating the transformative power of their leadership. With the surge and expansion of violent extremism and transnational crime increasingly threatening the stability of the Gulf of Guinea and Sahel regions, women are stepping forward to breaking the cycles of violence and taking the lead as custodians of peace.

Read here the full article published by UNDP on 4 April 2025.

 

 

The Beijing Declaration in 1995 recognized that gender equality is essential to democracy. Yet, 30 years later, progress remains uneven and at risk, with backlash against gender equality and democratic values threatening hard-won gains. Drawing on the Global State of Democracy Indices, produced by the International Institute for Democracy and Electoral Assistance (International IDEA), this technical paper explores advances, setbacks and gaps in gender equality and women’s political participation since 1995. As threats to gender equality and democracy grow, the 2025 Political Declaration of the United Nations Commission on the Status of Women (CSW) must reaffirm that women’s equal participation in decision making is fundamental to democracy—and that both gender equality and democracy must be protected (UN Economic and Social Council 2025).

In 2025 the world marks 30 years since the adoption of the Beijing Declaration and Platform for Action, which established a landmark agenda for women’s empowerment. Coinciding with the 30th anniversary of International IDEA—the only intergovernmental organization with the sole mandate to strengthen democracy—this milestone reaffirms the 1995 declaration that women’s equal participation in decision making, alongside equal rights, opportunities and access to resources, is essential for democracy, peace and human rights, ensuring a just society that protects the interests of all. The importance of gender equality was also reaffirmed by all UN member states in the 2030 Agenda, in particular through Sustainable Development Goal 5 and its targets 5.1. and 5.5, which emphasize the elimination of all forms of discrimination and the promotion of women’s political participation as key targets for achieving inclusive and sustainable development.

Read here the full report published by International IDEA on 31 March 2025.

 

New York, New York

March 10, 2025

AS PREPARED

The United States thanks the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia and co-facilitators Cabo Verde and Costa Rica, as well as all participating delegations and civil society partners, for their efforts in developing the Political Declaration.

While we are not a CSW member this year, we engaged in negotiations because the United States strongly supports protecting women and girls, defending their rights, and promoting their empowerment.

We are pleased the Declaration focuses on respecting, protecting, and promoting the human rights and fundamental freedoms of all women and girls.In signing Executive Orders to defend Americans from unhealthy and extremist gender ideology, President Trump has made clear his Administration will defend womens rights and protect freedom of conscience by using clear and accurate language and policies that recognize women are biologically female, and men are biologically male.

We also appreciate that the text addresses the need to prevent and respond to all forms of violence against women and girls.The Administration of President Trump has committed to protecting women by, among other things, curbing mass migration and securing borders. Violence against women and girls is rampant on migratory routes.Further, as we have seen in many tragic cases in the United States, women and girls are victimized by foreign criminals operating individually or in gangs.We must work against the open-borders ideology that tolerate such assaults on the rights of women.

However, several aspects of the text make it impossible for the United States to support the Declaration.These include, but are not limited to:

Language to Protect Women and Girls

It is the policy of the United States to use clear and accurate language that recognizes women are biologically female and men are biologically male.It is important to acknowledge the biological reality of sex to support the needs and perspectives of women and girls.We are disappointed the Political Declaration did not focus on the needs and perspectives of women and girls through precise terminology.

The United States supports the elimination of discrimination on the basis of all protected classes, including race, color, religion, sex, age, disability, national origin, and genetic information.We note the United States is not a party to the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women (CEDAW) and interpret references to CEDAW as relevant to States Parties and the implementation of their obligations.The United States emphasizes that non-binding declarations such as this Political Declaration do not change the current state of conventional or customary international law or imply that States must join or implement obligations under international instruments to which they are not a party.

Freedom of Opinion and Expression

With regard to paragraph 15(j), we note that in recent years governments have censored speech on online platforms, often by exerting substantial coercive pressure on third parties, such as social media companies, to moderate, deplatform, or otherwise suppress speech.Under the guise of combatting misinformation, disinformation, and malinformation, governments infringed on the constitutionally protected speech rights of Americans.Government censorship of speech is intolerable in a free society.

Right to Development

We regret the Political Declaration includes language on the purported “right to development,” as this term does not have an internationally agreed meaning.We cannot accept references to this as a right.

The 2030 Agenda

Another concern we have about this resolution is its reaffirmation of the 2030 Agenda and the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs).Although framed in neutral language, the 2030 Agenda and the SDGs advance a program of soft global governance that is inconsistent with U.S. sovereignty and adverse to the rights and interests of Americans.

In the last U.S. election, the mandate from the American people was clear:the government of the United States must refocus on the interests of Americans.We must care first and foremost for our own that is our moral and civic duty.President Trump also set a clear and overdue course correction on gender and climate ideology, which pervade the SDGs.

Put simply, globalist endeavors like the 2030 Agenda and the SDGs lost at the ballot box.Therefore, the United States rejects and denounces the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development and the SDGs, and we will no longer reaffirm them as a matter of course.

Equal Pay for Equal Work

The United States understands the intention of the inclusion of “equal pay for work of equal value” to promote pay equality between men and women, and accepts the formulation on that basis. The United States works to achieve pay equality by observing the principle of equal pay for equal work.

Temporary Special Measures

With respect to so-called “temporary special measures,” and other measures intended to achieve parity for women and girls, the United States opposes the use of quotas, targets, or goals for participation based on sex.It is the policy of the United States to protect the civil rights of all Americans and to promote individual initiative, excellence, and hard work.Every citizen, including women and girls, should have an equal right and opportunities, without discrimination, to take part in the conduct of public affairs.

Climate Change

The United States does not support the inclusion of references to climate change in this declaration.

Original post available here.

 

New York, New York

March 10, 2025

AS PREPARED

The United States thanks the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia and co-facilitators Cabo Verde and Costa Rica, as well as all participating delegations and civil society partners, for their efforts in developing the Political Declaration.

While we are not a CSW member this year, we engaged in negotiations because the United States strongly supports protecting women and girls, defending their rights, and promoting their empowerment.

We are pleased the Declaration focuses on respecting, protecting, and promoting the human rights and fundamental freedoms of all women and girls.In signing Executive Orders to defend Americans from unhealthy and extremist gender ideology, President Trump has made clear his Administration will defend womens rights and protect freedom of conscience by using clear and accurate language and policies that recognize women are biologically female, and men are biologically male.

We also appreciate that the text addresses the need to prevent and respond to all forms of violence against women and girls.The Administration of President Trump has committed to protecting women by, among other things, curbing mass migration and securing borders. Violence against women and girls is rampant on migratory routes.Further, as we have seen in many tragic cases in the United States, women and girls are victimized by foreign criminals operating individually or in gangs.We must work against the open-borders ideology that tolerate such assaults on the rights of women.

However, several aspects of the text make it impossible for the United States to support the Declaration.These include, but are not limited to:

Language to Protect Women and Girls

It is the policy of the United States to use clear and accurate language that recognizes women are biologically female and men are biologically male.It is important to acknowledge the biological reality of sex to support the needs and perspectives of women and girls.We are disappointed the Political Declaration did not focus on the needs and perspectives of women and girls through precise terminology.

The United States supports the elimination of discrimination on the basis of all protected classes, including race, color, religion, sex, age, disability, national origin, and genetic information.We note the United States is not a party to the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women (CEDAW) and interpret references to CEDAW as relevant to States Parties and the implementation of their obligations.The United States emphasizes that non-binding declarations such as this Political Declaration do not change the current state of conventional or customary international law or imply that States must join or implement obligations under international instruments to which they are not a party.

Freedom of Opinion and Expression

With regard to paragraph 15(j), we note that in recent years governments have censored speech on online platforms, often by exerting substantial coercive pressure on third parties, such as social media companies, to moderate, deplatform, or otherwise suppress speech.Under the guise of combatting misinformation, disinformation, and malinformation, governments infringed on the constitutionally protected speech rights of Americans.Government censorship of speech is intolerable in a free society.

Right to Development

We regret the Political Declaration includes language on the purported “right to development,” as this term does not have an internationally agreed meaning.We cannot accept references to this as a right.

The 2030 Agenda

Another concern we have about this resolution is its reaffirmation of the 2030 Agenda and the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs).Although framed in neutral language, the 2030 Agenda and the SDGs advance a program of soft global governance that is inconsistent with U.S. sovereignty and adverse to the rights and interests of Americans.

In the last U.S. election, the mandate from the American people was clear:the government of the United States must refocus on the interests of Americans.We must care first and foremost for our own that is our moral and civic duty.President Trump also set a clear and overdue course correction on gender and climate ideology, which pervade the SDGs.

Put simply, globalist endeavors like the 2030 Agenda and the SDGs lost at the ballot box.Therefore, the United States rejects and denounces the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development and the SDGs, and we will no longer reaffirm them as a matter of course.

Equal Pay for Equal Work

The United States understands the intention of the inclusion of “equal pay for work of equal value” to promote pay equality between men and women, and accepts the formulation on that basis. The United States works to achieve pay equality by observing the principle of equal pay for equal work.

Temporary Special Measures

With respect to so-called “temporary special measures,” and other measures intended to achieve parity for women and girls, the United States opposes the use of quotas, targets, or goals for participation based on sex.It is the policy of the United States to protect the civil rights of all Americans and to promote individual initiative, excellence, and hard work.Every citizen, including women and girls, should have an equal right and opportunities, without discrimination, to take part in the conduct of public affairs.

Climate Change

The United States does not support the inclusion of references to climate change in this declaration.

Original post available here.

 

Guest Editors
Roopa Dhatt, MD, MPA, Georgetown University, USA
Anna Kalbarczyk, DrPH, Johns Hopkins Center for Global Health, USA

Submission Status: Open   |   Submission Deadline: 7 December 2025

BMC Public Health is calling for submissions to our Collection on Women's role in politics and public life. We invite research that delves into the role of women in politics and public life, focusing on their leadership, participation, and the challenges they face. We welcome studies that examine gender equality, women's rights, and the impact of women's economic participation on public policy and health outcomes, with the aim of fostering a more inclusive political landscape.

Click here to apply.

Image by BioMedCentral

 

In the ever-evolving political landscape of Nigeria, the struggle for gender equality remains a daunting challenge, particularly in the sphere of elective politics. The ongoingordeals of Natasha Akpoti-Uduaghan and other female politicians serve as painful reminders of the deep-seated misogyny that continues to undermine women’s political participation. Despite constitutional guarantees and international conventions advocating for gender equity, women in Nigeria are still treated as political outsiders, systematically excluded, and viciously maligned.

To opine that there are stubborn walls of misogyny been waged against Nigerian women in politics is not an exaggeration. This is as misogyny is deeply entrenched in Nigeria’s socio-political fabric, manifesting in ways that range from subtle bias to outright violence against women who dare to challenge the status quo. The cultural and traditional expectations placed on women limit their ability to assert themselves in the public sphere. Many still believe that a woman's place is in the kitchen or at best in an appointed, symbolic role rather than in the competitive arena of elective politics.

In fact, Natasha Akpoti-Uduaghan’s political journey is a testament to the relentless opposition faced by women in politics. Despite her competence, courage, and determination, she has been subjected to smear campaigns, character assassination, and physical threats. Her case is not isolated. Women like Remi Sonaiya, ObyEzekwesili, and Aisha Yesufu have all faced virulent attacks simply for daring to seek political relevance. The misogynistic environment discourages many women from aspiring to public office, as they are often reduced to objects of ridicule rather than being recognized for their ideas and leadership capabilities.

Read here the full article published by Modern Ghana on 2 March 2025.

Image by Modern Ghana

 

Women are more likely to be hesitant in expressing their opinions about politics online than men, a new survey by Statista Consumer Insights has found. This was the case in all of the 21 countries polled, with the gender gap narrowest in Finland at 3 percentage points (22 percent male, 19 percent female) and widest in Mexico at 10 percentage points (26 percent male, 15 percent female). This mirrors wider patterns of gender roles and equality in society, with Finland having scored in the top three places in this year’s Global Gender Gap Index by the World Economic Forum.

Even aside from gender, the degree to which people express their views on politics online varies greatly by country. For example, in China only 13 percent of respondents on average said they had expressed their opinion about politics online in the past month. This includes having commented on or even liked a post related to politics on social media. In Japan (not shown on this chart), the figure was even lower at just 5 percent (7 percent men, 3 percent women). At the other end of the spectrum comes South Africa, where 32 percent of respondents said they had expressed their political opinion in the past four weeks (37 percent men, 27 percent women).

Read here the full article published by Statista on 17 January 2025.

Image by Statista

 

Background

The access to water and sanitation is recognised as human right and the access to clean drinking water and sanitation are essential to the realisation of all human rights.  The EESC with this own-initiative opinion is aiming to address the issue of water-related challenges for the most vulnerable population on the planet and to propose options for their empowerment.

Key points

In the opinion the EESC:

  • stresses that young people, women, and indigenous and local communities (including migrants and people with disabilities) are the most vulnerable to water stress and have a large untapped potential for contributing to sustainable water management, for turning water into an instrument of peace and stability, and, thus, for contributing to blue diplomacy;
  • calls on the EU to pay due attention to these groups in its external relations and international cooperation and suggests a lighthouse partnership programme related to water stress for addressing how to empower them in an integrated manner;
  • notes that access to clean water, education, employment and participation in policymaking are key elements of empowerment. Better access to water, sanitation and hygiene (WASH) services is crucial, as it frees up time for education and vocational training and opens up more diverse options for employment and the ability to contribute to water management and policies;
  • reaffirms that blue and digital technologies are instrumental for improving water management and access to clean water and sanitation;
  • highlights that meaningful partnership and funding are critical in the development of infrastructure, education and general capacity building. Both EU funds and national donors’ programmes play a crucial role here and coordination is vital to create synergies and make the most of the allocated resources.

Read here the full article published by the European Economic and Social Committee on 4 December 2024.

Image by the European Economic and Social Committee

 

What you need to know:

  • To effectively address TFGBV, support systems must be integrated into existing reporting mechanisms, providing clear communication channels for women to report incidents.

Uganda is making significant strides in its democratic processes, but the intersection of technology and politics poses both opportunities and challenges, especially for women. Technology-facilitated gender-based violence (TFGBV) has emerged as a major barrier for women in politics, where harassment, intimidation, and violence are prevalent. 

As we commemorate the 16 Days of Activism against Gender-Based Violence under the theme “Towards Beijing +30: UNiTE to End Violence Against Women and Girls,” it is crucial to address TFGBV through a multifaceted approach, including communication channels, education, awareness, and strong support systems. TFGBV is a pervasive issue that affects women at all levels of political engagement, from grassroots activism to national leadership. 

The Amplified Abuse report by Pollicy highlights the alarming prevalence of online violence during periods of political activity in Uganda. This violence, particularly directed at women in public life, exemplifies Violence Against Women in Politics (VAW-P). The research, conducted during the January 2021 general elections, examined social media accounts to assess how online harassment affects women’s political engagement

Read here the full article published by Monitor on 25 November 2024.

Image by Monitor