Skip to main content

Youth

A UPNG Student Attitudes Survey on women in politics showed a strong difference between the two genders with males less likely to support the opposite gender while females ranked other priorities ahead of political and leadership aspirations.

A TOTAL of 389 students from the University of Papua New Guinea School of Business and Public Policy participated in this year’s UPNG Student Attitudes Survey.

The students were again predominantly male (67 per cent) and mostly aged between 18 and 24.

In this blog on findings from that survey, we focus on their attitudes to gender.

The survey asked students about women in politics.

Full article.

 

Over the past decade we have had countless opinion pieces, documentaries and dramas about dangerously disenfranchised young men, with much discussion about why they’re moving to the populist right. Frustrated and overly online young men are widely seen to be the drivers of a quiet revolution that has been taking place in youth politics: the widening gender gap. Yet not enough thought has been given to young women’s much greater movement in the opposite direction. It might not be too surprising that women’s political preferences get less attention than men’s, but that does not mean they are any less significant.

Many have noted that at the last general election young (18- to 24-year-old) men were twice as likely as young women to vote Reform, while young women were twice as likely to vote Green as young men. There was also extensive coverage given to the signs of Gen Z men backing Nigel Farage. What these observations fail to take into account is that, in fact, a smaller percentage of young men voted for Reform (12 per cent) than the general population (14.3 per cent). Actually, 18- to 24-year-old men were far less likely to have voted for Farage than every other age cohort of men, and young men were still overwhelmingly more likely to vote for left-wing or liberal parties (68 per cent voted Labour, Lib Dem or Green) than they were for a right-wing party (22 per cent voted Conservative or Reform). If voting for a populist right party is indicative of a more radical mindset, then by this metric young men were some of the least radical demographic groups of the whole country. 

Full article.

 

International IDEA convened the Central Africa Dialogue on Advancing the Transformation of Gender Social Norms to Enhance Women and Youth Participation and Representation in Leadership and Decision-Making. The Dialogue was convened within the framework of the European Union (EU)-funded Women and Youth Democratic Engagement (WYDE) Women’s Leadership Initiative, implemented in partnership with UN Women, the Inter-Parliamentary Union (IPU), and United Cities and Local Governments (UCLG), under the overall coordination and leadership of UN Women. The Dialogue was held in in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia and focused on nine countries in the Central Africa region: Angola, Burundi, Cameroon, Central African Republic, Chad, Democratic Republic of Congo, Gabon, Republic of Congo and Rwanda.

Representatives from the WYDE Women’s Leadership Initiative partners included John Villiers, Programme Officer at the European Union Delegation to the African Union, Michael Steffens, the EU Delegation in Ethiopia, Schadrack Dusabe, Deputy Representative for UN Women in Ethiopia, Desset Abebe, Program Specialist on Leadership and Governance, UN Women in Ethiopia  and Jainaba Faye, International IDEA Programme Manger in The Gambia.

Full article.

 

“Let us turn these experiences into guidance, transforming barriers into bridges,” urged Ms. Gabriela Morawska-Stanecka, IPU Vice-President, in her opening address at the 151st Inter-Parliamentary Union (IPU) Assembly, held on 19–23 October 2025 in Geneva, Switzerland. She highlighted how women, youth, and other marginalized groups continue to face discrimination, exclusion, and structural obstacles, and emphasized that their lived experiences can inform the creation of more inclusive and effective political systems.

These themes resonated throughout the Assembly, shaping discussions across the Standing Committees on Peace and International Security, Sustainable Development, Democracy and Human Rights, and United Nations Affairs. The Committee to Promote Respect for International Humanitarian Law also engaged with these issues, particularly during its open session on safeguarding humanitarian action in times of armed conflict.

The Forum of Women Parliamentarians and the Forum of Young Parliamentarians advanced these conversations further through focused sessions on transforming social norms to promote and ensure the meaningful participation and representation of women in politics. The outcomes of these sessions were incorporated into the Assembly’s broader work on leadership transformation and the parity debate, featuring men and women MPs advocating for gender equality.

Together, the Vice-President’s remarks and the deliberations across these bodies set the tone for five days of dialogue centred on women’s empowerment, youth inclusion, intersectional equality[1], and the broader goal of building political systems that leave no one behind.

Ms. Morawska-Stanecka also reaffirmed the IPU’s commitment to inclusive representation and participation, recalling General Recommendation #4 on the Equity and Inclusive Representation of Women in Decision-Making and referencing the Plan of Action for Parity in Parliament, adopted earlier this year at the Global Conference of Women Parliamentarians in Mexico. She expressed hope that the IPU Governing Council would soon adopt this plan to ensure that gender equality remains central to political participation worldwide. She also introduced the new IPU campaign, “Achieving Gender Equality: Action by Action,” designed to translate high-level commitments into meaningful, measurable progress for women and girls.

As part of the Assembly’s commitment to inclusive representation, the Forum of Women Parliamentarians focused on empowerment and advocacy initiatives to strengthen the meaningful participation and representation of women in politics. The session provided an opportunity to review progress, identify persistent gaps, and share good practices from across regions. Delegates heard testimonies highlighting ongoing harassment, institutional sexism, and the rise of online gender-based violence targeting women in politics. Speakers noted that such attacks, including trolling, coordinated disinformation campaigns, and threats of physical harm, are increasingly used to silence women leaders and discourage their active participation in public life.

Special emphasis was placed on GBV in the Asia-Pacific region, where many women parliamentarians report facing higher levels of digital hate, culturally driven stigma, and limited institutional protection. Delegates also explored collaborative initiatives with UN Women and the Government of Australia on e-safety training, self-protection protocols, secure communication practices, and digital defense strategies that help women legislators respond to online abuse while maintaining their public roles.

The Assembly underscored that these tools and trainings must be tailored to the real, lived needs of women lawmakers particularly those from marginalized communities or working in polarized political environments who are often the most frequent targets of online attacks. Participants were encouraged to consult the IPU’s report on sexism and violence against women in parliaments in Asia, which documents patterns of abuse and provides concrete recommendations for institutional reform, with similar studies planned for the Americas and the Caribbean to strengthen evidence-based responses globally.

2025 marks significant milestones for the global women’s movement: the 15th World Conference of Speakers of Parliament, the 30th anniversary of the Beijing Platform for Action, 25 years of the UNSC Resolution 1325 on Women, Peace, and Security, and the 40th anniversary of the Forum of Women Parliamentarians. Yet discussions revealed worrying trends: global progress in women’s parliamentary representation is stagnating, and in some cases, rolling back. The Plan of Action for Parity in Parliament seeks to address these trends through concrete measures, monitoring, and regional collaboration, with the next Women Parliamentarians’ Conference scheduled in Serbia.

The Assembly also featured two side-event consultations on social norms under the EU-funded WYDE Women’s Leadership Initiative. These discussions centred on transforming harmful gender norms, including the pervasive belief that “men must dominate and women must serve.” Participants examined the role of technology facilitated gender-based violence and discrimination, stressing that genuine transformation requires not only legal reforms but also shifts in societal narratives and cultural practices.

A second consultation focused on women’s leadership, youth engagement, and intersectional inclusion. Discussants from Turkey and Switzerland highlighted the need to address intersectional discrimination, including barriers faced by women with disabilities, women of colour, and women navigating multiple forms of marginalization. Researchers present emphasized that inclusive parliaments are more stable, more legitimate, and better equipped to address issues that might otherwise be overlooked.

Across the sessions, several key recommendations emerged: adopting and implementing the IPU Plan of Action for Parity, institutionalizing intersectional equality including disability representation, combating online harassment with policy and training, mobilizing resources for women’s political participation, using parliamentary diplomacy to tackle gender injustices, and challenging harmful social norms through education, mentorship, and inclusion.

The 151st IPU Assembly was more than a meeting of policymakers, it was a renewed declaration of commitment. From Vice President Gabriela Morawska-Stanecka’s call to turn obstacles into bridges, to the lived experiences shared by MPs from every region, one message resounded clearly: gender equality is not merely a goal; it is the very foundation of democracy. The Assembly’s deliberations offered both inspiration and direction, charting a path toward a future in which women and youth are not only included in democratic life but shape and strengthen it as essential leaders.


[1] The notion of intersectional equality acknowledges that women can face multiple, overlapping forms of discrimination and seeks to address these intersecting barriers.

 

INTRODUCTION

The Beijing Declaration in 1995 recognized that gender equality, inclusion and representation is essential to democracy. However, 30 years later, progress remains uneven and at risk, with a backlash against gender equality and democratic values threatening hard-won gains. The Report on Beijing30+ review meeting recognizes that the empowerment of women as leaders and decision-makers remains crucial to sustainable development and the achievement of the Sustainable Development Goals by 2030. Furthermore, it affirms that Gender-balanced decision-making is integral to justice, effective governance, peace and human rights. Therefore, increasing women’s participation in leadership roles within political, public, and economic sectors is essential for inclusive societies, strengthening economies, and enriching the decision-making processes. Yet this recognition must be embedded in systems of change, legislations, social norms, and backed by a strong political will to enhance the role of women in politics. 

Building on the above context, this webinar series explored the challenges, opportunities, and future for women in politics, highlighting global trends in women's political participation over the past 30 years. The discussion was conducted in three languages (Arabic, English, and French) and was structured around the following key questions:

  • History of the Beijing Platform for Action – Significance of the platform as a key moment in history that guided women’s equal representation and participation.
  • How have indicators on gender equality changed over the last 30 years?
  • How do we as development sector practitioners improve women’s political participation in the next decade? What steps must be taken today?
  • Transforming Social Norms for sustainable change. Given the backsliding of democracy, the next decade demands a concerted effort by activists and advocates of gender equality – what steps are needed?
  • Looking inwards, how can women-led movements organize better to have concrete impact in the next decade?

Speakers:

  • Amanda Luz, Program Director, People Powered (Brazil)
  • Anna Sande, Young Politician, Citizens Coalition for Change (Zimbabwe)
  • Emma Meche, Youth Activist, Beijing+30 Youth Steering Committee (Albania)

The talk was moderated by Amna Syed, Project Coordinator, iKNOW Politics

Full report.
Full video.

 

Summary of facts and figures on the participation of young people in politics based on 2025 figures.

Learn about the IPU's work on youth empowerment.

Key findings

In October 2024, the IPU amended its Statutes to define a young MP as below the age of 40 years. Previously this limit was 45. To be sensitive to national variations in the meaning of “young”

as well as variations in the age of eligibility to hold parliamentary office, the IPU report explores trends in relation to two age categories: 30 and under, and 40 and under.

The following are key findings of the 2025 IPU report on youth participation in national parliaments.This 2025 report is the sixth IPU review of youth participation in national parliaments. It maps the presence of young members of parliament (MPs) worldwide, providing the most recent data on the proportion of MPs aged 30 and under and MPs aged 40 and underat the time of the most recent election or renewal. The report also provides insights on good practices to increase youth participation in parliament. Age data in this report comes from 210 parliamentary chambers in 155 countries and is current as of 31 July 2025

Original post.

 

INTRODUCTION

The Beijing Declaration in 1995 recognized that gender equality, inclusion and representation is essential to democracy. However, 30 years later, progress remains uneven and at risk, with a backlash against gender equality and democratic values threatening hard-won gains. The Report on Beijing30+ review meeting recognizes that the empowerment of women as leaders and decision-makers remains crucial to sustainable development and the achievement of the Sustainable Development Goals by 2030. Furthermore, it affirms that Gender-balanced decision-making is integral to justice, effective governance, peace and human rights. Therefore, increasing women’s participation in leadership roles within political, public, and economic sectors is essential for inclusive societies, strengthening economies, and enriching the decision-making processes. Yet this recognition must be embedded in systems of change, legislations, social norms, and backed by a strong political will to enhance the role of women in politics. 

Building on the above context, this webinar series explored the challenges, opportunities, and future for women in politics, highlighting global trends in women's political participation over the past 30 years. The discussion was conducted in three languages (Arabic, English, and French) and was structured around the following key questions:

  • History of the Beijing Platform for Action – Significance of the platform as a key moment in history that guided women’s equal representation and participation.
  • How have indicators on gender equality changed over the last 30 years?
  • How do we as development sector practitioners improve women’s political participation in the next decade? What steps must be taken today?
  • Transforming Social Norms for sustainable change. Given the backsliding of democracy, the next decade demands a concerted effort by activists and advocates of gender equality – what steps are needed?
  • Looking inwards, how can women-led movements organize better to have concrete impact in the next decade?

Speakers:

  • Amanda Luz, Program Director, People Powered (Brazil)
  • Anna Sande, Young Politician, Citizens Coalition for Change (Zimbabwe)
  • Emma Meche, Youth Activist, Beijing+30 Youth Steering Committee (Albania)

The talk was moderated by Amna Syed, Project Coordinator, iKNOW Politics

Full report.
Full video.

 

Summary of facts and figures on the participation of young people in politics based on 2025 figures.

Learn about the IPU's work on youth empowerment.

Key findings

In October 2024, the IPU amended its Statutes to define a young MP as below the age of 40 years. Previously this limit was 45. To be sensitive to national variations in the meaning of “young”

as well as variations in the age of eligibility to hold parliamentary office, the IPU report explores trends in relation to two age categories: 30 and under, and 40 and under.

The following are key findings of the 2025 IPU report on youth participation in national parliaments.This 2025 report is the sixth IPU review of youth participation in national parliaments. It maps the presence of young members of parliament (MPs) worldwide, providing the most recent data on the proportion of MPs aged 30 and under and MPs aged 40 and underat the time of the most recent election or renewal. The report also provides insights on good practices to increase youth participation in parliament. Age data in this report comes from 210 parliamentary chambers in 155 countries and is current as of 31 July 2025

Original post.

 

Talking about youth political participation means confronting two main issues. On one hand, there is a dominant narrative portraying young generations as apathetic or disengaged from the future of their communities. On the other, from a more scientific standpoint, the challenge lies in understanding what political participation means today in an increasingly digital, multicultural, and disintermediated context.

New research commissioned by the Istituto Toniolo di Studi Superiori, based on unpublished data from Ipsos, explores the dynamics shaping the relationship between young people (aged 18 to 34) and politics today.

What is political participation?

First of all, there is no universal consensus on the definition of political participation. Interpretations range from traditional institutional views — limiting participation to behaviours aimed at influencing government decisions and selecting representatives — to broader conceptions that hold everything as political.

This spectrum shapes how we describe youth political activism, with narrow definitions excluding emerging forms of participation, while overly broad ones risk diluting the concept.

Full article available here.

 

A new ranking by UN Women and the Inter-Parliamentary Union puts Nigeria 179th out of 185 countries for the percentage of women in the national legislature.

Women currently make up only 3.9% of seats in the House of Representatives. In the Senate, three of the 108 current members are women. In the executive branch, women head eight of 45 (17.8%) of ministries.

This absence of women in prominent positions in politics subtly reinforces societal biases and moulds public opinion, which subconsciously excludes women from political leadership.

We are a group of researchers who have expertise in gender and African politics and childhood political socialisation. We have been researching the political socialisation of children in Nigeria for the past three years.

Our research in Ogun State reveals that children are internalising what they see on the political stage. We asked children aged 5 to 16 at 12 schools in Ogun State to imagine and draw a leader such as a president, governor, or member of a national or state assembly at work. Only 5% of 981 children drew a woman as a political leader.

Ninety-two percent of girls drew a man, compared to 98% of boys.

Full article by The Conversation.

Image source: The Conversation

 

While almost two-thirds of young people in the U.S. support democracy, almost a third view it skeptically and are more inclined to accept authoritarianism, according to a new report on attitudes of youth in America after the 2024 elections.

In a nationally representative poll of 18–29 year olds by the Center for Information & Research on Civic Learning and Engagement (CIRCLE) at Tufts University's Jonathan M. Tisch College of Civic Life and Protect Democracy, researchers found that 62% of the young people surveyed display "passive appreciation" for democracy, trusting , valuing democratic principles, and rejecting authoritarianism and political violence.

At the same time, the people in this group—who are more likely than the average to be conservative—are not civically engaged and do little more than vote, which doesn't augur well for democracy, say the report authors.

And then there are the 31% of the Gen Z survey respondents who do not buy into the value of democracy, have little confidence that the system works, and show higher support for authoritarian governments than other youth. This group, which the researchers refer to as displaying "dismissive detachment" from democracy, vote at a similar rate as other youth, but rarely participate in , and believe that they cannot create political change.

Read here the full article published by Phys.org on 14 April 2025.

Image by Phys.org

 

Young people’s urban lives are often riddled with inequalities and everyday obstacles inhibiting their full societal participation, to negatively affect their health and wellbeing. Findings from a study in intermediary cities in six countries show that programming interventions that support adolescents contain much tacit knowledge in on how inequity and exclusion challenges may be overcome, that is worth sharing. Yet, these initiatives also face and must strategically respond.

Today, Equity, Diversity and Inclusion has become a dirty word in some political circles. US presidential action ostensively seeking to curtail illegal and immoral discrimination’ has involved the immediate termination of federal government policies, programs, and activities towards advancing equity and inclusion. Simultaneously, a sledgehammer has been put to USAID, creating havoc in countless international development projects globally, and causing real, immediate and enduring harm to people’s livelihoods, lives and health, with children and adolescents being amongst those hardest hit.

This hostility towards equity and inclusion stands in sharp contrast to what young people and adults supporting them in health and wellbeing projects in intermediary cities in Colombia, Ecuador, Ghana, India, Senegal and Vietnam have recently told us.

Read here the full article published by the Institute of Development Studies on 3 April 2025.

Image by HCA-II programme and Alza Tu Voz project