Skip to main content

Youth

The Commonwealth Secretariat and the Commonwealth Parliamentary Association will co-host a hybrid Rule of Law Seminar focused on advancing the participation of young women in politics in member countries.

The seminar will bring together parliamentarians, experts and emerging leaders to share experiences, discuss challenges and identify practical ways to increase women’s participation in political and parliamentary processes.

Discussions will highlight proven approaches that have helped break down structural and cultural barriers to women’s political participation. Participants will also explore how these approaches can be adapted and scaled in different country contexts to support more young women to enter and lead in politics.

Speakers

  • Adriana Quiñones, Deputy Head of UN Women, Geneva Office
  • Cylcia Manwa, Former Councillor, Thurrock, Essex
  • Professor Sarah Childs, Professor of Politics and Gender, University of Edinburgh
  • Samantha Marshall, Attorney at Law, Stapleton Chambers, Antigua and Barbuda
  • Tanya August-Phillips, Parliamentarian, Tynwald, Isle of Man


Register to attend

Register to attend in person    Register to attend online 

The Gen-Z-led uprising in Nepal did not erupt out of nowhere – it emerged from intersecting pressures that had been quietly building for decades. The first was a collective discontent with entrenched political corruption and nepotism – a system where bribery has long been normalised, taxpayer money is routinely embezzled into private pockets, and political leaders live lavish lives with little accountability. This simmering resentment found a visual language on TikTok, where young Nepalis began mirroring a trend seen across Asia: publicly calling out the children of politicians by exposing their designer clothes, luxury travel, and elite lifestyles.

The second trigger came when the Nepali government abruptly banned major social media platforms including TikTok, Instagram, Facebook, YouTube, and X, citing regulatory failures. Many citizens however, believed the ban was an attempt to suppress the growing anti-corruption discourse ahead of elections. These two forces collided on 8 September 2025 as tens of thousands took to the streets in protest. What began peacefully turned deadly by the afternoon, when police fired live rounds into crowds. In the days that followed, the total death toll rose to 76, with over 2,000 people injured.i

The public’s anger proved uncontainable over the next two days. Protesters set fire to businesses, the parliament building, and several politicians’ homes. Prime Minister K.P. Sharma Oli and Home Minister Ramesh Lekhak resigned. The unrest eventually subsided only after the military assumed control, imposing a curfew of three days. Meanwhile, over 100,000 people, mainly from Gen Z, discussed and debated on Discord groups about potential interim leaders.ii

Sushila Karki, Nepal’s first female chief justice, emerged as the most popular choice due to her strong anti-corruption stance and was subsequently elected as interim Prime Minister through formal political channels, making her the first woman in Nepal’s history to hold the highest political office. Her rise was not just a response to crisis, but a reflection of how public trust, digital momentum, and political urgency began to align. These events can be explored further through three critical lenses: digital mobilisation, diaspora involvement, and gendered visibility.

Full article.

India’s democracy has grown in scale, but not quite in balance. Women today are active participants in elections, influencing outcomes in ways that were not as visible earlier. Yet their presence in legislative institutions continues to lag behind. The Nari Shakti Vandan Adhiniyam was meant to address this gap through reservation. But its linkage with delimitation brought in an element of delay, and perhaps even a degree of distrust, raising a basic question: does this present imbalance really need to wait for a redrawing of boundaries to be addressed?

The Representation Deficit: More than Just Numbers

The gap is easy to quantify, but harder to justify. In the 18th Lok Sabha (2024), only 74 women were elected – about 13.6% of the House. This is not dramatically different from where we were years ago. Progress has been slow, almost reluctant.

Globally, women make up over a quarter of national parliaments. In India, both at the Centre and in most state assemblies, we remain well below that mark. What makes this more puzzling is that women are no longer politically invisible as voters. They turn up, they decide, and increasingly, they influence electoral outcomes. Yet, they are still missing at the table where decisions are made.

Full article.

Working in feminist communications and advocacy, Verónica sees media not simply as a profession, but as a powerful political tool. The creation of Pícara emerged from a sense of exclusion and the need to confront violence, challenge stereotypes, and reshape public narratives around women and gender-diverse people. When Verónica and her classmates graduated with degrees in communication, traditional media environments felt unwelcoming and unsafe. “It was as if we didn’t belong there,” she recalls, and participation often meant exposure to “multiple forms of violence.” Rather than accepting those conditions, they decided to create a feminist communication space that could operate differently — one that would actively work to “break stereotypes and debunk some myths.”

What united the founders of Pícara was a shared belief that communication could drive social change. They connected with other feminist colleagues who viewed media as “a tool for transformation,” and from that collective vision, Pícara was born.

Central to Verónica’s work is the power of language. “We focus primarily on the use of language as a tool for transformation,” she explains, emphasizing how words shape how experiences are named, understood, and addressed. In Argentina, feminist movements have long fought to change the narratives surrounding violence against women. One of the most significant shifts was moving away from describing the murder of women as crimes of passion to naming them as femicides.

Full article.

UNITED NATIONS, New York – As technology reshapes our world, a staggering 85 per cent of women have witnessed online violence against other women, and 38 per cent have been personally affected. 

Yet despite its proliferation, technology-facilitated gender-based violence is still too often dismissed or inadequately addressed, by both policymakers and technology companies.

At the 59th Commission on Population and Development, held at the United Nations Headquarters this month, global leaders agreed there can be no digital inclusion without digital safety. As they convened to discuss how technology and research are influencing sustainable development, participants also examined the urgent need for digital spaces that are designed and governed with safety and human rights at their core.

A central concern is the rise of technology-facilitated gender-based violence – including cyberstalking, doxxing, digital surveillance and non-consensual sharing of intimate images – which disproportionately affects women, girls and other marginalized groups. 

Full article.

Dhaka: Bangladesh is witnessing a quiet yet devastating rise in the misuse of technology with rising incidents of women being targetted by superimposing their faces onto pornographic content.

Enabled by Artificial Intelligence (AI), this practice, known as 'deepfake', primarily targets women, with consequences - such as social ruin, forced withdrawal from public life, and, in the worst cases, death - borne almost entirely by the victims, a report said.

According to a report in Bangladesh's leading newspaper 'Daily Sun', the victims come from diverse walks of life, including students, activists, professionals, politicians, actresses, and anonymous private individuals.

"In one of the most devastating cases documented in Bangladesh, a woman took her own life after an AI-edited video of her was shared with her family. The perpetrator understood precisely how Bangladeshi social structures work — family honour, community judgement, and the irreversibility of digital shame — and used a fabricated video to trigger all three at once. Her death was not an accident of technology. It was the intended result of its deliberate misuse," the report detailed.

Full article.

Summary of facts and figures on the participation of young people in politics based on 2025 figures.

Learn about the IPU's work on youth empowerment.

Key findings

In October 2024, the IPU amended its Statutes to define a young MP as below the age of 40 years. Previously this limit was 45. To be sensitive to national variations in the meaning of “young”

as well as variations in the age of eligibility to hold parliamentary office, the IPU report explores trends in relation to two age categories: 30 and under, and 40 and under.

The following are key findings of the 2025 IPU report on youth participation in national parliaments.This 2025 report is the sixth IPU review of youth participation in national parliaments. It maps the presence of young members of parliament (MPs) worldwide, providing the most recent data on the proportion of MPs aged 30 and under and MPs aged 40 and underat the time of the most recent election or renewal. The report also provides insights on good practices to increase youth participation in parliament. Age data in this report comes from 210 parliamentary chambers in 155 countries and is current as of 31 July 2025

Original post.

 

Talking about youth political participation means confronting two main issues. On one hand, there is a dominant narrative portraying young generations as apathetic or disengaged from the future of their communities. On the other, from a more scientific standpoint, the challenge lies in understanding what political participation means today in an increasingly digital, multicultural, and disintermediated context.

New research commissioned by the Istituto Toniolo di Studi Superiori, based on unpublished data from Ipsos, explores the dynamics shaping the relationship between young people (aged 18 to 34) and politics today.

What is political participation?

First of all, there is no universal consensus on the definition of political participation. Interpretations range from traditional institutional views — limiting participation to behaviours aimed at influencing government decisions and selecting representatives — to broader conceptions that hold everything as political.

This spectrum shapes how we describe youth political activism, with narrow definitions excluding emerging forms of participation, while overly broad ones risk diluting the concept.

Full article available here.

 

A new ranking by UN Women and the Inter-Parliamentary Union puts Nigeria 179th out of 185 countries for the percentage of women in the national legislature.

Women currently make up only 3.9% of seats in the House of Representatives. In the Senate, three of the 108 current members are women. In the executive branch, women head eight of 45 (17.8%) of ministries.

This absence of women in prominent positions in politics subtly reinforces societal biases and moulds public opinion, which subconsciously excludes women from political leadership.

We are a group of researchers who have expertise in gender and African politics and childhood political socialisation. We have been researching the political socialisation of children in Nigeria for the past three years.

Our research in Ogun State reveals that children are internalising what they see on the political stage. We asked children aged 5 to 16 at 12 schools in Ogun State to imagine and draw a leader such as a president, governor, or member of a national or state assembly at work. Only 5% of 981 children drew a woman as a political leader.

Ninety-two percent of girls drew a man, compared to 98% of boys.

Full article by The Conversation.

Image source: The Conversation

 

While almost two-thirds of young people in the U.S. support democracy, almost a third view it skeptically and are more inclined to accept authoritarianism, according to a new report on attitudes of youth in America after the 2024 elections.

In a nationally representative poll of 18–29 year olds by the Center for Information & Research on Civic Learning and Engagement (CIRCLE) at Tufts University's Jonathan M. Tisch College of Civic Life and Protect Democracy, researchers found that 62% of the young people surveyed display "passive appreciation" for democracy, trusting , valuing democratic principles, and rejecting authoritarianism and political violence.

At the same time, the people in this group—who are more likely than the average to be conservative—are not civically engaged and do little more than vote, which doesn't augur well for democracy, say the report authors.

And then there are the 31% of the Gen Z survey respondents who do not buy into the value of democracy, have little confidence that the system works, and show higher support for authoritarian governments than other youth. This group, which the researchers refer to as displaying "dismissive detachment" from democracy, vote at a similar rate as other youth, but rarely participate in , and believe that they cannot create political change.

Read here the full article published by Phys.org on 14 April 2025.

Image by Phys.org

 

Young people’s urban lives are often riddled with inequalities and everyday obstacles inhibiting their full societal participation, to negatively affect their health and wellbeing. Findings from a study in intermediary cities in six countries show that programming interventions that support adolescents contain much tacit knowledge in on how inequity and exclusion challenges may be overcome, that is worth sharing. Yet, these initiatives also face and must strategically respond.

Today, Equity, Diversity and Inclusion has become a dirty word in some political circles. US presidential action ostensively seeking to curtail illegal and immoral discrimination’ has involved the immediate termination of federal government policies, programs, and activities towards advancing equity and inclusion. Simultaneously, a sledgehammer has been put to USAID, creating havoc in countless international development projects globally, and causing real, immediate and enduring harm to people’s livelihoods, lives and health, with children and adolescents being amongst those hardest hit.

This hostility towards equity and inclusion stands in sharp contrast to what young people and adults supporting them in health and wellbeing projects in intermediary cities in Colombia, Ecuador, Ghana, India, Senegal and Vietnam have recently told us.

Read here the full article published by the Institute of Development Studies on 3 April 2025.

Image by HCA-II programme and Alza Tu Voz project

 

Context

Women across the Middle East and North Africa (MENA) region continue to face underrepresentation in political and economic spheres, which limits their ability to shape important political and economic decisions. Although several countries in the region have introduced rules to increase women’s participation, their perspectives and needs remain largely excluded from both national and regional negotiations. Furthermore, as conflicts in the region persist and escalate, women face additional barriers, which undermine the progress already made towards achieving gender equality.

Approach

The project focuses on increasing women’s political and economic participation in the MENA region through targeted actions and collaborations. To achieve this, it implements the following measures:

  • The project provides tailored advice and development opportunities to economic and political change agents, enhancing the impact of their work.
  • It shares successful and innovative strategies across the region to encourage adoption in other countries, with the goal of increasing women’s participation.
  • The project cooperates with national and regional networks to implement measures that promote women’s involvement in economic and political life.
  • It promotes women’s fundamental human rights, ensuring they can influence policies that advance gender equality and inclusion in the MENA region.
  • The project raises awareness across various age groups, fostering a more active role for women in political and economic activities.

Read here the full article published by GIZ on 8 November 2024.

Image by GIZ