Parliaments & Representatives
Main navigation
As usual, Congress gathers around this time of year to try to extract some electoral advantage from International Women’s Day. Close to March 8, lawmakers typically hold a joint effort to approve measures aimed at female voters—initiatives that, on their merits, few would oppose. They include important proposals to combat violence and femicide and to promote health programs specifically focused on women. But it is necessary to scratch beneath the surface.
Amid interruptions and ongoing threats, misogyny remains a constant in parliamentary relations. There will be relatively few female candidates for state governorships and, at the national level, after many years the presidential election will not feature a woman’s name on the ballot.
This is not unique to Brazil. A recent report by the Inter-Parliamentary Union (IPU), an international organization founded in 1889 that brings together legislatures from 183 countries, shows that as of January 2026 women hold only 27.5% of the seats in the 49 parliaments that underwent renewal, a slight increase compared with the 27.2% recorded a year earlier. According to the organization, the positive fluctuation repeats the pace observed in 2024, marking the slowest growth since 2017 for the second consecutive year.
In Comoros, gender equality and women’s rights are upheld by the Constitution and the 2017 National Policy on Gender Equality and Equity. Gender issues are also addressed in the country’s development roadmap, Comoros Emerging Plan 2030, which promotes the empowerment of women and girls across all sectors (Madjid, 2023).
However, gender inequality is a pressing concern in the country. Comorian women have notably lower literacy rates than men (67% compared to 73%). They are less likely than men to attain post-secondary education and more likely to have no formal schooling (Union of the Comoros, 2022).
Women’s economic participation is significantly lower, with just 39% of working-age Comorian women actively engaged in the labour force, compared to 58% of men (Union of the Comoros, 2023). This disparity heightens their vulnerability to abuse. Among 78 reported cases of economic violence from April to June 2025, 64% involved women (United Nations Children’s Fund, 2025a).
On International Women's Day 2026, the Friedrich Naumann Foundation for Freedom (FNF) is publishing a series of studies on gendered disinformation in Mexico, Lebanon, and the Philippines. The series follows earlier policy papers on Czechia and Slovakia.
Gendered disinformation is used worldwide to attack women who are involved in politics and public life. It takes many forms, from sexualized defamation and targeted reputation damage to threats and harassment. The aim is to push these women out of the public debate and to intimidate and deter others.
Country studies
The studies are based on data, expert assessments, and the experiences of those affected. They reveal both recurring patterns and country-specific approaches.
At the same time, they are more than just an inventory of damage and risks: they show the resilience of those affected and develop concrete approaches to counteract it – from political measures and platform responsibility to journalistic diligence and civil society engagement.
- Mexico: EON Institute builds on findings from an FNF collaboration that examined the use of generative AI in Mexico's 2024 elections and elaborates on the Mexican perspective in expert panels and dialogues with young women.
- Lebanon: Samir Kassir Eyes Center and InflueAnswers analyze gender-related disinformation in Lebanon based on in-depth interviews with women in politics and journalism, comprehensive literature research, and international comparisons.
- Philippines: The Center for Liberalism and Democracy analyzes gendered disinformation using prominent case studies in the Philippines and classifies it using different theoretical approaches
Relevant for those affected and for democracy
The findings show that gendered disinformation is neither solely a women's issue nor solely a question of digital rights, but rather a challenge for liberal democracy as a whole. Because those who want to silence women want to weaken democracy.
HAVANA TIMES – Women’s political participation in Latin America and the Caribbean has increased over the last 25 years, especially in the legislative branch, but this rise has been accompanied by more discrimination and violence, amplified and accelerated by cyberspaces.
A report by the United Nations Development Program (UNDP) notes that, despite the progress, the region “is still far from achieving gender parity,” since, “as female participation grew, so did the challenges women face.”
“Among the persistent barriers, digital political violence has become an increasingly significant obstacle,” the report states.
In its most recent Graph For Thought, the regional UNDP emphasizes that in 2024, the Latin American and Caribbean region registered the highest proportion worldwide of Congressional seats held by women, with 36.5% of the total seats.
That statistic places them above the 33.3% overall Congressional participation of women in the OECD countries (Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development), which are mostly industrialized nations, as well as the global average of 27%.
That same year, the proportion of women magistrates in supreme courts was five times higher than in 1998, rising from 5.5% to 28.2%. Representation in national Parliaments and municipal councils also doubled during that period.
Meanwhile, the percentage of women holding Cabinet-level positions increased from 17.1% to 30.4%. Some local spaces showed greater resistance to change, however: in 2024, only 15.9% of mayors in the region were women, making this the area with the lowest female representation.
From Bolivia to Kyrgyzstan, some countries are proving that, with the right rules and political will, real progress towards gender parity in parliaments is within reach.
Slow progress, but with snapshots of inspiration: that’s the picture to emerge from the IPU’s recently published annual Women in parliament in 2025 report. Based on data from the 49 countries that held parliamentary renewals for 62 chambers last year, it is the definitive barometer of women’s representation in parliament.
Overall, the report paints a worrying picture of the world’s progress towards the goal of gender parity in politics. Women hold 27.5% of national parliamentary seats worldwide after a mere 0.3 percentage point rise from 2024’s rate. The proportion of women Speakers of Parliament, meanwhile, has dipped by almost 4 percentage points on the previous year.
Yet, despite sluggish progress at the global level, countries across all seven continents continue to make strides. They set valuable examples that we hope to see emulated by others in the coming years.
Violence against politicians is a part of politics, but experimental studies find that its effect on citizens is muted. Rozemarijn van Dijk and Joep van Lit argue those null results are nevertheless meaningful: they should push scholars to study the conditions under which political violence results in (de)mobilisation
Violence against politicians is, regrettably, a part of political life. Politicians are harassed and intimidated on social media, campaign materials are vandalised, and many politicians work under constant security protection. Sometimes this climate of hostility escalates into direct physical attacks on politicians. At its extreme, political violence is fatal. Substantial evidence shows that such experiences change how politicians behave. Experiences of violence influence the ways politicians interact with constituents, what issues they are willing to speak about publicly, and whether they choose to remain in political life.
As such, political violence (which we define as violent acts by individuals, not international violence or terrorism) is directly threatening democracy. The perpetrators intend it not only to silence its immediate targets but also to send a signal to bystanders (‘normal citizens’): stay in line, stay quiet, stay out of politics. This is the demobilising effect of political violence, inducing fear and self-censorship. Conversely, if political violence provokes outrage rather than fear, we might expect it to have a mobilising effect.