Skip to main content

Women's Leadership

Last month, representatives from UN Women and Zenobia, a civil society organization, spoke at the launch of France’s feminist foreign policy strategy by Minister for Europe and Foreign Affairs Jean-Noël Barrot, highlighting the need for a feminist approach to global peace and technology.

Last month, UN Women and Zenobia — a Syrian civil society organization supported by the Women’s Peace and Humanitarian Fund, or WPHF — were invited to speak at the launch of France’s international strategy for a feminist foreign policy. The event marked a key moment in reaffirming the centrality of gender equality and women’s rights across diplomacy, peace, and technology. It also offered a timely opportunity to reflect on how digital governance and peacebuilding intersect with the ambitions of feminist multilateralism.

Four years ago in Paris, UN Women and the government of France stood alongside global advocates to launch the Generation Equality Forum. This initiative aimed to accelerate global gender equality through collaborative, multistakeholder partnerships that would mobilize concrete commitments and increase investments to advance the Beijing Platform for Action. Our goal was ambitious: to build the world’s first multistakeholder Action Coalition on Gender, Technology and Innovation. We were driven by the conviction that the digital revolution will not advance justice and democracy unless it is feminist.

Read here the full article published by Devex on 21 April 2025.

Image by Devex

 

Jennifer M. Piscopo is a Professor of Gender and Politics and Director of the Gender Institute at Royal Holloway, University of London. Her research examines gender, elections, and democracy, with a focus on women’s political participation in Latin America and the United States. Jennifer Piscopo joined a two-day Expert Group Meeting (EGM) organized by UN Women to address one of the most persistent barriers to gender equality in political and public life: discriminatory social norms. The event held on 4-5 February 2025 brought together feminist scholars, policymakers, activists, and practitioners to chart a path forward for transforming social norms and ensuring women’s full and effective political participation. This experts’ meeting was organized under the WYDE | Women’s Leadership, funded by the European Union, which is a collaborative global effort aimed at advancing women’s full and effective political participation and decision-making at all levels, especially those most often left furthest behind.

  1. What sparked your passion for studying women's representation and gender in elections?

I'm American, and when I was growing up, there were very few women in U.S. politics. Unfortunately, that’s still the case today—there are very few women in key political leadership roles.

But in some countries, that wasn’t the case. They elected more women to office and even as heads of state and government, which is what led me to comparative political science. I wanted to be able to compare and understand why some countries break barriers to women’s political participation more successfully than others.

  1. What are the key barriers to women’s political participation?

There are many barriers. One common narrative is that women doubt their own abilities and capacities to run for office – which is perhaps true in some cases. So many development programs and organizations have therefore focused on boosting women’s confidence and encouraging them to see themselves as political actors. But actually, self-doubt isn’t the biggest barrier! If this were the case, we wouldn’t see such stark differences across countries in electing women. One of the real, more significant obstacles is political parties. Political parties have historically been male-dominated, which means men control who gets nominated, what resources are provided for campaigns and how elected officials maintain power. Women often find themselves blocked from these institutions that have been historically dominated by men. Even when women meet the required qualifications, the bar shifts. First, they’re told they lack the right education, so they get degrees in law or business. However then, they’re told they lack political experience. So the goalposts keep moving for women, which is the reason we focus so much on the preparing women as political leaders. But this emphasis on preparing women means we actually miss out on policy interventions which should focus on the barriers. We need to target political parties or party leaders to change their attitudes and beliefs, and redefine what qualifications matter. The real issue isn’t women "fixing themselves"—it’s fixing the institutions that gatekeep political opportunities.

  1. How do gender quotas help?

Gender quotas are a great example of policies that cut through or bypass cultural and individual beliefs that society may have about women political leaders. Quotas can challenge both cultural biases and party structures, since they require parties to nominate women, forcing the parties to recruit, train, and position them women candidates for success.

And quotas work. When quotas are enforced, suddenly political parties find, support, and elect women. And not only do women win, but they also prove to be effective leaders and successful at governing.

Quotas can be viewed as a sort of shortcut, to swiftly raise number of women in office, overcoming individual and partisan barriers.

Finally, beyond increasing numbers, quotas transform institutions. They have a knock-on effect. They lead to changes within party cultures, parliamentary codes of conduct and meeting structures, ensuring a more inclusive and professional environment. Quotas, and women entering institutions through quotas, actually have a transformative effect across the board within parties and parliaments in addition to the fact that elected women may hold different policy priorities.

  1. Why is it important to apply a gender lens when analyzing elections?

When I started this work, I worked with political scientists who said, "Elections are about the best candidate winning. This is democracy and this is what we study." But taking a gender lens in this work makes us question that assumption. Because, if men are always winning, despite no inherent difference in abilities or talent, then what does that say about our electoral processes? If democracy means equal opportunity, why don’t we see equal outcomes for men and women in elections? Studying gender in elections reveals whether a democracy is truly substantively meaningful and inclusive. If the same types of candidates always win, are we really getting diverse representation? Are institutions truly accountable to all citizens, or just to those who have historically held power? 

  1. What advice would you then give young women entering politics?

It’s not you, it’s them! Institutions are designed to preserve themselves and it may feel like the bar keeps moving for women when entering these institutions.

At first, you’ll be told you don’t speak up enough. So, you start speaking up. Then, you’ll be told you lack credentials. So, you’ll get them. And still, the bar shifts again.

This isn’t about your shortcomings, it’s about those in power wanting to maintain the status quo. Adjust when necessary, but don’t lose hope, trust yourself, keep pushing. And keep knocking down these barriers, change will happen!

Click here to see the original post published on Capacity4Dev (European Union) on 23 April 2025.

 

MONROVIA — A prominent fundraising campaign for Edith Gongloe-Weh, the only female candidate in Tuesday’s upcoming senatorial by-election in Nimba County, has drawn widespread support from prominent women, including former President Ellen Johnson Sirleaf. But the noticeable absence of key female legislators has raised questions about solidarity within Liberia’s female political circles.

Since April 15, women have gathered at Invincible Park fish market in Monrovia to raise $10,000 for Gongloe-Weh’s campaign, with funds earmarked for poll watchers to protect votes, similar to efforts that helped Senator Botoe Kanneh secure her seat in 2020.

“Anyone who stops women is stopping progress in the world,” said Sirleaf, 86, who briefly visited the fundraiser to contribute. The former president praised Gongloe-Weh’s past service as Nimba County superintendent, saying, “She shows integrity, commitment, and dedication.”

But conspicuously missing from these events have been Senator Botoe Kanneh and Senator Nyonblee Kargar Lawrence, chair of the Women’s Legislative Caucus — the very organization established to support female political participation.

Read here the full article published by Front Page Africa on 21 April 2025.

Image by Front Page Africa

 

Politics is a tough subject: it can either paint you as a villain or the master of progress.Sithembile Mbete is a political analyst whose passion goes beyond reporting. She questions the status quo and is not afraid to call out those who abuse power.

How did you become a political analyst?

I studied politics, French and economics for my undergraduate degree, then did honours and masters in international relations at UCT. My first job was at IDASA, a think tank, where I monitored parliamentary committee meetings and helped analyse the 2011 local government elections. That’s where I learned the ropes of political analysis.

I also got involved in civil society campaigning against the “Secrecy Bill”, which gave me insight into political activism and grassroots organising. After that I worked in the Presidency as a researcher for the National Planning Commission Secretariat, which gave me an insider’s view of the government. It was quite an education! I decided to further my studies with a PhD at the University of Pretoria where I’ve been a senior lecturer and researcher since 2013.

Read here the full interview published by Glamour on 28 March 2025.

Image by Glamour

 

What you need to know:

  • When we silence women in politics through sexism, we're robbing ourselves of the leadership our nation desperately needs.
  • Their courage in the face of this hostility demands not just our admiration, but our immediate action.

Last week as the Independent Electoral and Boundaries Commission (IEBC) selection panel interviews played out on our screens, I couldn't help but notice the stark imbalance: eight men, three women shortlisted for the chairperson position.

And like clockwork, the familiar refrain emerged: "How will we ever achieve the two-thirds gender rule if women don't apply?" This question is tiring.

It's not that women lack ambition—it's that they understand the price of it all too well.

When we ask why women aren't applying, we're ignoring the storm they must walk into simply to serve their country. Kawira Mwangaza, the former Meru governor who made history in 2022 becoming the first female governor-elect in the  county, didn't just face impeachment last month—she faced a systematic dismantling that sends a chilling message to every woman watching: "This space is not for you." While men in power insist "it wasn't about gender," political aspirants are already admitting they'd now think twice before supporting women candidates.

This calculated exclusion isn't happening in a vacuum. It's a global phenomenon. When Kamala Harris ran for the American presidency last year, we witnessed the predictable playbook: attacks on her appearance and questioning of her qualifications despite her extensive experience. An analysis found over 11,000 news articles with biased language about her in just two weeks. This isn't criticism—it's a coordinated effort to undermine women's legitimacy in leadership.

Read here the full article published by The Nation on 4 April 2025.

Image by The Nation

 

The Women and Foreign Policy program’s most recent update of the “Women’s Power Index” ranks 193 United Nations (UN) member states on their progress toward gender parity in political participation. It analyzes the proportion of women who serve as heads of state or government, in cabinets, in national legislatures, as candidates for national legislatures, and in local government bodies, and visualizes the gender gap in political representation.  

Over the past year global progress toward gender parity in political representation has remained flat at 29 on the 100-point aggregate scale employed in which a 100-point score represents gender parity. The number of countries that are halfway or more to parity has remained the same. Twenty-eight countries exceeded fifty in their gender parity score, including Canada, Dominica, Moldova, and the United Kingdom in the past year. Mozambique, Peru, Rwanda, and Senegal fell below that halfway to parity mark in the past year. The U.S. gender parity score is slightly above the global average at 35. Iceland has maintained its position in first place, with a score of 86, Mexico and Andorra occupy second and third place, with scores of 75 and 73, respectively. 

Progress in women’s political leadership at the national level has been stalling recently. Since the end of World War II, 82 of the 193 countries have elected a female head of state or government, with the most progress coming in the past two decades. Eleven countries elected their first woman into high office during the 2000s, twenty-five in the 2010s, and seventeen thus far in the 2020s. Most recently, Namibia elected its first woman president, Netumbo Nandi-Ndaitwah, in 2025, and Mexico elected its first woman president, Claudia Sheinbaum, in 2024.

Read here the full article published by the Council on Foreign Relations on 2 April 2025.

Image by the Council on Foreign Relations

 

By Ellen Johnson Sirleaf

While rebuilding a country previously engulfed in civil war for over 14 years, my administration oversaw, then, one of the deadliest health crises of the 21st century. I, Africa’s first democratically elected woman president and Liberia’s first elected president of the post-conflict period, had to pivot quickly in both attitude and action, as a means of responding to the Ebola outbreak of 2014. The outbreak posed a devastating threat to Liberia’s people and to the gains we had made in recovery and development. Rather than falter, we leaned into the complex challenges the outbreak posed, crafting and embarking upon an approach that embraced the strategies called for by community health workers and ordinary people fighting to save their loved ones. During this period, we lost many lives but averted a national crisis and found an inclusive and sustainable path of hope. In most African countries, strengthening the national health structure requires investing in and prioritizing community health workers and systems. Local community health workers are crucial in times of crisis because of their proximity to those most impacted. Utilizing community leadership ensures communities feel empowered and share in the responsibility, creating genuinely inclusive and responsive approaches. Liberia’s early success in addressing the COVID-19 pandemic relied on the same community health workers and leaders from the Ebola crisis. They were central in the dissemination of reliable information, coordination efforts across the country, building partnerships both internally and internationally, and leading their communities.

Haga clic aquí para leer el artículo completo.


The primary objective of this 2019 CEMR study on women in politics is to evaluate the progression of women’s representation in decision-making over a ten-year period and to present an overview of the current situation. The study aims to mobilise actors and decision- makers at all levels across Europe, in the institutions and organisations included in the study, but also in the associations of local and regional governments, political parties, civil society organisations, as well as anyone interested in just and democratic governance.

Click here to download the report 

LGBTQ Victory Institute’s The Decision to Run Report set out to uncover the barriers and motivators for LGBTQ women who want to run for office. The findings — a result of an extensive survey of nearly 290 LGBTQ women as well as four focus groups — show six common barriers and four motivators mentioned by respondents. It is a first glance – not a comprehensive account – of the challenges LGBTQ women encounter. Yet it can be a guide for equality organizations, campaign training organizations and candidate recruitment programs that believe in the importance of representation for LGBTQ women, as well as a starting point for future research.

Click here to download the report. 

This policy brief shows that while much remains to be explored, there are clear links between anti-corruption and women's political participation that are important to understand for politicians, anti-corruption advocates, and those working on increasing women’s representation in political office.

Click here to read the full report.

RepresentWomen's Arab State Brief reviews the extent to which women are represented in Arab countries, the history of Arab independence and revolutions - and their impact on women's rights and representation; and country-specific information that covers the history of systems reforms and their impact on women's political rights and representation in the region.

Click here to read the full report.

This article is the first in a two-part series examining the impact of gender quotas. The second article discusses the impact of quotas in Sweden and India.

Gender quotas exist in a shockingly high number of countries. More than 130 nations have modified their constitutions, electoral laws, or party rules to specify a threshold of women to be selected or nominated to a political body.

Quotas have had a massive impact globally on the number of women in politics, explaining the variation in women’s political representation by country. Between 1995 and 2012, many countries implemented quotas globally, and one study found a correlation between quotas and women’s political representation. Women’s political representation jumped from 11 percent to 21 percent during that time. Quotas are also associated with women being elected to government positions even more so than democratic ideals, economic development, or religious norms.

Click here to read the full article published by Harvard International Review on 29 November 2021.